Featured post

c# - Usage of Server Side Controls in MVC Frame work -

-
i using asp.net 4.0 , mvc 2.0 web application. project requiremrnt have use server side control in application not possibl in noraml case. ideally want use adrotator control , datalist control. i saw few samples , references in codepleax mvc controllib howwver found less useful. can tell how utilize theese controls in asp.net application along mvc. note: please provide functionalities related adrotator , datalist controls not equivalent functionalities thanks in advace. mvc pages not use normal .net solution makes use of normal .net components impossible. a normal .net page use event driven solution call different methods service side mvc use actions , view completly different way handle things. also, mvc not use viewstate normal .net controlls require. found article discussing mixing of normal .net , mvc.
3 comments

ado.net - Accessing SQL Server in parallel -

-

i'm trying use task-parallel-library offload expensive ado.net database access ui thread (formerly program i'm re-writing freeze, updating vb6 text box progress, until data in database loaded). have complex dependency structure (26 individual tasks), , i'm trying figure out how of worth parallelizing.

i'd know whether or not io access can parallelized @ performance bonuses. if not i'll sequentially load data , update ui whenever enough information loaded perform task, it'd nice boost loading maybe 2 things @ time instead of 1 (even if don't double speedup).

it's possible parallelizing increase performance, not guaranteed. depends on bottleneck is.

for example, if request expensive because loads lots of data, consumes of clients network bandwith. parallelizing in case wouldn't much, if @ all.

if, on other hand, bottleneck sql processing and sql request leaves sql server spare capacity in own bottleneck, can profit sql servers (very good) parallelizing capabilities.

it possible parallelizing slows down. if example sql server has not ram , access single disk, forcing multiple queries in parallel may lead more seek activity on harddisk, can dramatically slow down overall read rate.

so, is, answer isn't simple yes or no, "it depends".


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Usage of Server Side Controls in MVC Frame work -

-
i using asp.net 4.0 , mvc 2.0 web application. project requiremrnt have use server side control in application not possibl in noraml case. ideally want use adrotator control , datalist control. i saw few samples , references in codepleax mvc controllib howwver found less useful. can tell how utilize theese controls in asp.net application along mvc. note: please provide functionalities related adrotator , datalist controls not equivalent functionalities thanks in advace. mvc pages not use normal .net solution makes use of normal .net components impossible. a normal .net page use event driven solution call different methods service side mvc use actions , view completly different way handle things. also, mvc not use viewstate normal .net controlls require. found article discussing mixing of normal .net , mvc.
Read more

ios - Very simple iPhone App crashes on UILabel settext -

-
i have simple application. have button , label in ib. have ibaction onclick calls settext on label. there's outlet label. connected in ib. crashes app first time in simulator. when launch again, sets text. crashes again next time. crashes on actual device. should simple, i'm not sure i'm doing wrong. thanks. in .h file : #import <uikit/uikit.h> @interface untitledviewcontroller : uiviewcontroller { iboutlet uilabel *label; iboutlet uibutton *button; } @property (nonatomic, retain) uilabel *label; -(ibaction) onclick1: (id) sender; @end and in .m: - (ibaction) onclick1: (id) sender { //[label settext:@"hello world!"]; label.text = @"hello world!"; //[button settitle:@"clicked" forstate:uicontrolstatenormal]; } sorry, i'm new site. how crash log , stack? thanks. edit : while answer technically correct, doesn't answer question @ :( sorry < warning - guess > if you're...
Read more

mysql - Why there can be only one TIMESTAMP column with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in DEFAULT clause? -

-
why there can 1 timestamp column current_timestamp in default or on update clause? create table `foo` ( `productid` int(10) unsigned not null, `addeddate` timestamp not null default current_timestamp, `updateddate` timestamp not null default current_timestamp on update current_timestamp ) engine=innodb; the error results: error code : 1293 incorrect table definition; there can 1 timestamp column current_timestamp in default or on update clause this limitation, due historical, code legacy reasons, has been lifted in recent versions of mysql: changes in mysql 5.6.5 (2012-04-10, milestone 8) previously, @ 1 timestamp column per table automatically initialized or updated current date , time. restriction has been lifted. timestamp column definition can have combination of default current_timestamp , on update current_timestamp clauses. in addition, these clauses can used datetime column definitions. more information, see automati...
Read more