Featured post

c# - Usage of Server Side Controls in MVC Frame work -

-
i using asp.net 4.0 , mvc 2.0 web application. project requiremrnt have use server side control in application not possibl in noraml case. ideally want use adrotator control , datalist control. i saw few samples , references in codepleax mvc controllib howwver found less useful. can tell how utilize theese controls in asp.net application along mvc. note: please provide functionalities related adrotator , datalist controls not equivalent functionalities thanks in advace. mvc pages not use normal .net solution makes use of normal .net components impossible. a normal .net page use event driven solution call different methods service side mvc use actions , view completly different way handle things. also, mvc not use viewstate normal .net controlls require. found article discussing mixing of normal .net , mvc.
3 comments

iis 7 - .NET Framework 1.1 on IIS 7 -

-

i have inherited .net framework 1.1 web site must host iis 7 on windows server 2008. i'm having trouble.

1. installation

i installed .net framework 1.1 following these instructions.

the installation automatically created new application pool "asp.net 1.1". use that.

2. trouble

when launch web site see web.config runtime errors:

the tag contains invalid value 'culture' attribute.

i fix 1 , see:

child nodes not allowed.

i don't want keep playing whack-a-mole game. something must wrong.

3. sure .net 1.1?

i examine automatically created application pool. see it's 1.1.

advanced settings...

automatic apppool .net 1.1 advanced

basic settings...

automatic apppool .net 1.1 basic

this doesn't seem right.

while 1.1 set, it's not option in advanced drop down selectors.

and why in basic box "v1.1" , not ".net framework v1.1.4322"? more consistent.

4. cannot create other .net 1.1 app pools

i cannot select .net framework 1.1 other application pools. it's not option in drop down selectors. what's that?

app pool missing .net 1.1 option

what now?

  • why isn't v1.1 option apppools?
  • how can verify application in fact using .net framework 1.1?
  • why might these runtime errors?

a quick-fire way find out if application running under 1.1 knock quicky script displays environment version:

<%@ page language="c#" %> <script runat="server">     void page_load(object sender, eventargs e)     {         response.write(system.environment.version.tostring());            } </script>

or if you're getting yellow screens of death you'll see version number @ bottom of page: alt text

i suspect reason can't select framework v1.1 when adding new application pool or modifying existing 1 1.1 installer doesn't know how add critical piece of metadata or config info iis.

.net 2.0 ships 2008 , .net 4.0 being later product iis7 friendly there better iis integration. or, v1.1 doesn't have essential nugget of metadata iis7's inetmgr needs able add various lists.

the reason can see v1.1 in drop downlist asp.net 1.1 pool basic settings dialogue , not other pools because it's been set , included in list. experimented , changed on newly created asp.net 1.1 pool , set 2.0, saved, re-opened. result v1.1 isn't visible more.

additionally reason it's called v1.1 , not .net framework v1.1.4322 because value being picked managedruntimeversion attribute in app pool config in applicationhost.config. reason versions 2.0 , 4.0 show full description there's piece of iis friendly metadata resource string being looked isn't present 1.1.

to set pool use v1.1 @ creation time have manually set managedruntimeversion attribute using appcmd.exe:

 appcmd add apppool /name:"newpool"  /managedruntimeversion:"v1.1"

this explained @ bottom of article linked to.

to change existing pool use 1.1 must use command line appcmd.exe tool:

 appcmd set apppool /apppool.name:"someotherpool" /managedruntimeversion:"v1.1"

interestingly can set managedruntimeversion old value:

alt text

i wish explain away why asp.net 1.1 application pool magically gets created or how installer manages right thing handler mappings (somehow correct preconditions set, either installer has been updated or iis has kind of trigger 1.1 being installed , fix things).

update:

i contacted bill staples, author of article:

how install asp.net 1.1 iis7 on vista , windows 2008

i asked him how 1.1 installer or iis7 manage right thing regarding handler mappings, creating "asp.net 1.1" application pool , on. reply:

"if memory serves, in vista/windows 2008 there application compatibility shim created detect 1.1 installer , app pool creation/handler mapping. however, in windows 7 / windows server 2008 r2, .net framework 1.1 no longer supported , wouldn't surprised if code pulled, though don't know sure."

so mystery solved.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Usage of Server Side Controls in MVC Frame work -

-
i using asp.net 4.0 , mvc 2.0 web application. project requiremrnt have use server side control in application not possibl in noraml case. ideally want use adrotator control , datalist control. i saw few samples , references in codepleax mvc controllib howwver found less useful. can tell how utilize theese controls in asp.net application along mvc. note: please provide functionalities related adrotator , datalist controls not equivalent functionalities thanks in advace. mvc pages not use normal .net solution makes use of normal .net components impossible. a normal .net page use event driven solution call different methods service side mvc use actions , view completly different way handle things. also, mvc not use viewstate normal .net controlls require. found article discussing mixing of normal .net , mvc.
Read more

ios - Very simple iPhone App crashes on UILabel settext -

-
i have simple application. have button , label in ib. have ibaction onclick calls settext on label. there's outlet label. connected in ib. crashes app first time in simulator. when launch again, sets text. crashes again next time. crashes on actual device. should simple, i'm not sure i'm doing wrong. thanks. in .h file : #import <uikit/uikit.h> @interface untitledviewcontroller : uiviewcontroller { iboutlet uilabel *label; iboutlet uibutton *button; } @property (nonatomic, retain) uilabel *label; -(ibaction) onclick1: (id) sender; @end and in .m: - (ibaction) onclick1: (id) sender { //[label settext:@"hello world!"]; label.text = @"hello world!"; //[button settitle:@"clicked" forstate:uicontrolstatenormal]; } sorry, i'm new site. how crash log , stack? thanks. edit : while answer technically correct, doesn't answer question @ :( sorry < warning - guess > if you're...
Read more

mysql - Why there can be only one TIMESTAMP column with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in DEFAULT clause? -

-
why there can 1 timestamp column current_timestamp in default or on update clause? create table `foo` ( `productid` int(10) unsigned not null, `addeddate` timestamp not null default current_timestamp, `updateddate` timestamp not null default current_timestamp on update current_timestamp ) engine=innodb; the error results: error code : 1293 incorrect table definition; there can 1 timestamp column current_timestamp in default or on update clause this limitation, due historical, code legacy reasons, has been lifted in recent versions of mysql: changes in mysql 5.6.5 (2012-04-10, milestone 8) previously, @ 1 timestamp column per table automatically initialized or updated current date , time. restriction has been lifted. timestamp column definition can have combination of default current_timestamp , on update current_timestamp clauses. in addition, these clauses can used datetime column definitions. more information, see automati...
Read more